Evidence Act: How far should the changes go?
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Monday
June 27, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
MONDAY, JUNE 27, 2022
Evidence Act: How far should the changes go?

Thoughts

Ibrahim Khalil
05 March, 2021, 12:30 pm
Last modified: 05 March, 2021, 12:30 pm

Related News

  • Digital evidence now to be admissible in court
  • HC orders to submit report on steps taken to repeal section 155 (4) of Evidence Act
  • Northern Ireland's peace deal under threat unless EU changes Brexit deal, loyalists warn
  • Pandemic: Changes we dreamed vs the way we changed
  • Changes will be made to Digital Security Act: Law Minister

Evidence Act: How far should the changes go?

Special tribunals, such as the Cyber ​​Crime Tribunal, the Speedy Trial Tribunal Act, the ICT Act and the Digital Security Act, have direct instructions for the use of video footage, but not in the general law

Ibrahim Khalil
05 March, 2021, 12:30 pm
Last modified: 05 March, 2021, 12:30 pm
Ibrahim Khalil, journalist. Sketch: TBS
Ibrahim Khalil, journalist. Sketch: TBS

On Aug 28, 2019, the panel of Justice Md Shawkat Hossain, Justice Md Ruhul Quddus and Justice ASM Abdul Mobin made an acute observation in a verdict on the case "The State Vs Oli." Parts of the full verdict of this death reference case that was published on 27 September, last year, read like this:

"This is also a demand of time that after unimaginable development of Information and Communication Technology and its use in commission of various offences, our Evidence Act should be made up-to-date by way of amendment or new legislation to deal with the developed technology as well as electronic record/document. In India some special provisions i.e. sections 65A, 65B and 67A are incorporated in their Evidence Act. Some other provisions, namely, sections 47A, 73A, 85A, 85B, 85C, 88A, 90A are also added to harmonise it for dealing with electronic record and definition of evidence as given in section 3 has also been amended."

This is the latest observation of high court division regarding our evidence act which was made in 1872 during the British period. 

Their observation says, Bangladesh's Evidence Act should be made up-to-date through an amendment or a new legislation to deal with the technological developments as well as electronic records or documents. While making the observation, the court cited "unimaginable development" of information and communication technology and its use in commission of various offences as one of the reasons behind the decision.
With this important observation of the High Court, it is clear how uncomfortable it is for our judiciary to hold on to a law that is one and a half centuries old as well as how important it is to reform the Evidence Act over time in this age of modern technology.

We have the Evidence Act of 1872 in the rules for dealing with evidence in tribunals and courts. There are basically two types of evidence. The first is the oral witness, which is what a certain witness describes in court, and the second is the documentary, which refers to the documents that are presented for the observation of the court.

The five examples given in Section 3 of the Act as "documents" do not include the current digital cameras, audio, video or audio visual records held on mobiles.

When no direct evidence is available of any incident (that includes crimes like killings) which might have occurred in a remote area of ​​the country, CCTV camera footage and videos captured on mobile phones can play an important role as evidence in the case.

Since the use of electric devices as evidence is not mentioned in the five documents under Section-03 of the existing Evidence Act, people seeking justice, namely the victim and his family are being deprived of justice during the trial. 

For this reason, the Evidence Act needs to be updated by amending the existing law on the content of digital evidence. Time has changed, our laws need to reflect that. We need to amend our laws now to eliminate confusion about the acceptability of electronic witnesses.

Photo: Collected
Photo: Collected

Special tribunals, such as the Cyber ​​Crime Tribunal, the Speedy Trial Tribunal Act, the ICT Act and the Digital Security Act, have direct instructions for the use of video footage, but not in the general law.

When acts such as the Digital Security Act 2016 and the Information Technology Act 2006 were passed, we needed to make the Evidence Act, Penal Code, Bankers' Books Evidence Act, etc. digitally relevant which did not happen.

As the types, strategies and means of crime change with the advancement of technology day by day, it is necessary to make arrangements for the trial of all new types of crimes by enacting laws in a timely manner and that is the need of the hour. Otherwise, the criminals will be able to commit crimes and the culture of impunity will reappear.

When India enacted the Information Technology Act in 2000, it amended the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act of 1872 to make it digitally modern.

Not only the Evidence Act, but also the Penal Code of 180 and the Bankers Books Evidence Act of 1891 had been amended at the same time with the Information Technology Act. Only we did not correct the act.

Now let's come to a different section of the Evidence Act.

Under Section 155 (4) of the Evidence Act, when a man is prosecuted for rape or an attempt to ravish, it may be shown that the woman was of generally "immoral character" to help the accused. The clause violates various international charters. It becomes difficult to punish the culprits in such cases. Allegations of rape are usually filed under the Women and Child Abuse Prevention Act. Because the lawyer of the accused wants to take "unethical" advantage of this section of the law. 155 (4) is an obstacle for the victims of rape who are seeking justice.

That section should not remain according to the constitution. The law dates back to the colonial period. The provision is a reflection of the Victorian concept. Now there are opportunities for DNA testing too. In rape cases, the DNA law can be applied to evidence.

I will end the article by mentioning an incident of January 13, 2020. On the day, a four-day workshop on 'Use of Digital Evidence in Courts' was organized by the US Embassy in Dhaka and the UK High Commission. Judges and prosecutors of Bangladesh took part in this workshop. Judiciary officials from the United States and the United Kingdom took part as well. Speaking as the chief guest on the occasion, Chief Justice of Bangladesh Syed Mahmud Hossain said, "It is necessary to update the Evidence Act which is more than one hundred years old. That law of 1872 is undoubtedly playing an important role in the judicial process till now. However, in the context of the rapid development of science and technology in the 21st century, there is a need to change this law." 

According to him, the obstacles to the introduction of digital evidence should be removed which will help the judges and the investigators.Therefore, it is very important to change and amend the Evidence Act without wasting time.


Ibrahim Khalilullah is an Investigative Broadcast Journalist at Jamuna Television; Dhaka, Bangladesh. He is also an International Fellow & Member at IRE (Investigative Reporters & Editors); Columbia, US


Disclaimer: The explanations given and views expressed in this article are the author's own and TBS does not necessarily endorse nor support those.

Evidence Act / far / changes

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Photo: TBS
    No long queues of vehicles after govt bans motorbikes on Padma Bridge 
  • Hundreds of motorcycles, cars, buses and other vehicles were in a queue at the toll plaza of the Padma Bridge on Sunday as the bridge drew a massive number of visitors on the first day after its inauguration. PHOTO: MUMIT M
    Padma Bridge: First day sees over Tk2cr toll collection
  • Bengal tiger numbers cannot be doubled in 10, 20 or even 100 years in any wilderness area of the world, let alone in Bangladesh. Photo: Reuters
    Are we living in a fool’s world? Wild tiger number can’t be doubled in 10 or 20 years

MOST VIEWED

  • Sketch: TBS
    The UN knows Afghanistan is messed up. But it’s keeping mum
  • Sketch: TBS
    A legal and political analysis of World Bank’s Padma Bridge snub
  • Sketch: TBS
    Time for a macro policy change?
  • Mariana Mazzucato and Alan Donnelly. Sketch: TBS
    How the G7 could help the debt-distressed
  • Dr Rakib Al Hasan. Sketch: TBS
    Fire safety in Bangladesh: An abysmal picture
  • Gearoid Reidy. Sketch: TBS
    The fertility crisis started in Japan, but it won't stay there

Related News

  • Digital evidence now to be admissible in court
  • HC orders to submit report on steps taken to repeal section 155 (4) of Evidence Act
  • Northern Ireland's peace deal under threat unless EU changes Brexit deal, loyalists warn
  • Pandemic: Changes we dreamed vs the way we changed
  • Changes will be made to Digital Security Act: Law Minister

Features

Photo: Collected

Samsung Dryer: Taking clean clothes to a new level

21m | Brands
Transparent sticky notes. Photo: Collected

A new layer to annotations with transparent sticky notes

11m | Brands
Bengal tiger numbers cannot be doubled in 10, 20 or even 100 years in any wilderness area of the world, let alone in Bangladesh. Photo: Reuters

Are we living in a fool’s world? Wild tiger number can’t be doubled in 10 or 20 years

1h | Panorama
Photo: Noor A Alam

The reign of oversized pantsuits

23h | Mode

More Videos from TBS

Jalamije becomes Georgian citizen to play Wimbledon

Jalamije becomes Georgian citizen to play Wimbledon

13h | Videos
Sievierodonetsk falls to Russia

Sievierodonetsk falls to Russia

17h | Videos
'Anondolok' is a fun field of dance,music and culture

'Anondolok' is a fun field of dance,music and culture

19h | Videos
Learn all about sports in Khelbei Bangladesh

Learn all about sports in Khelbei Bangladesh

22h | Videos

Most Read

1
Padma Bridge from satellite. Photo: Screengrab
Bangladesh

Padma Bridge from satellite 

2
Photo: Prime Minister's Office
Bangladesh

New investment in transports as Padma Bridge set to open

3
Japan cancels financing Matarbari coal project phase 2
Bangladesh

Japan cancels financing Matarbari coal project phase 2

4
Desco wanted to make a bold statement with their new head office building, a physical entity that would be a corporate icon. Photo: Courtesy
Habitat

Desco head office: When commitment to community and environment inspires architecture

5
Photo: TBS
Infrastructure

Gains from Padma Bridge to cross $10b, hope experts

6
20 businesses get nod for $326m foreign loan for expansion
Economy

20 businesses get nod for $326m foreign loan for expansion

EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab
BENEATH THE SURFACE
Vehicles ply the Padma Bridge on Sunday marking the beginning of a new era for the country’s southern region. The bridge was inaugurated on 25 June amid much fanfare. PHOTO: MUMIT M

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net