Another capricious regulation
Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
The Business Standard

Thursday
August 11, 2022

Sign In
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Analysis
  • World+Biz
  • Sports
  • Features
  • Epaper
  • More
    • Subscribe
    • COVID-19
    • Bangladesh
    • Splash
    • Videos
    • Games
    • Long Read
    • Infograph
    • Interviews
    • Offbeat
    • Thoughts
    • Podcast
    • Quiz
    • Tech
    • Archive
    • Trial By Trivia
    • Magazine
    • Supplement
  • বাংলা
THURSDAY, AUGUST 11, 2022
Another capricious regulation

Analysis

Zahid Hussain
12 August, 2021, 08:15 pm
Last modified: 13 August, 2021, 12:56 am

Related News

  • BB allows banks to make drawing arrangements without prior permission
  • Taka devalued further, LC rate shoots to Tk112 a dollar
  • Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 
  • Bangladesh Bank and DNCC honour bKash
  • Loan rescheduling: Banks can’t show interest as income without recovering principal

Another capricious regulation

Zahid Hussain
12 August, 2021, 08:15 pm
Last modified: 13 August, 2021, 12:56 am
Economist Zahid Hussain. Illustration: TBS
Economist Zahid Hussain. Illustration: TBS

The Bangladesh Bank (BB) has decreed that banks cannot set interest rates on fixed deposits below the inflation rate. In the circular, it explained that this is intended to protect the incomes of small depositors, encourage savings, prevent the diversion of savings to unsafe investments, and protect the asset-liability balance of the banks.

All these intentions are laudable. Will these be achieved by mandating that the term deposit rates cannot fall below the inflation rate, or could there be some unintended consequences that may make this intervention self-defeating?

Consider first the income protection argument. Yes, by making inflation rate the floor, you make sure individuals who hold term deposits in banks do not lose out in real terms. This takes a rather naive view of how it all works. Forcing banks to offer rates they do not want to offer will only make them not offer the product itself.

When you cap lending rate at 9% and set an inflation-based floor on fixed deposit rate when inflation has rarely been below 5.5% in recent memory, how do you expect banks to remain profitable other than by trying to minimise their cost of funds? This was happening anyway because of the cap on the lending rate. Decreased demand for credit and rapid accumulation of excess liquidity reinforced the effect of the lending rate cap.

Now the inflation-based lending rate floor will further exacerbate the preference for current and saving deposits from the banks' side. In that case the same individuals who the BB wants to protect may have no option but to hold their money in current and savings accounts that are not subject to the latest regulation. They will end up losing even the "low" interest rate on term deposits the banks were offering before this regulation was put in place.

What effect will this have on their savings and how savers store their savings? If availability of safe stores of value such as fixed deposits in banks decline, the savers will either stop or reduce saving and store it in unsafe or unproductive investments that the BB is worried about. The cure may be worse than the disease.

How will this regulation help protect the asset-liability balance of banks? BB officials cited the possibility of banks drawing down their capital because of weaknesses in deposit growth when rates on deposits are below inflation. They also told the media that the new regulation constitutes only 30% of the total deposit. If you think this is small, as the BB wants you to think, don't be surprised if it gets even smaller.

What has been the experience? Deposits have grown irrespective of whether the rates are in line with inflation. Deposit growth in the last twelve months makes it clear. This happened primarily because of a surge in formal remittances and a rise in digital commerce most which require payments through the banking system. According to BB data, the number of deposit accounts held by individuals in the scheduled banks have increased despite the growth recession caused by the pandemic.

There is a ceiling of 87% on the Advance-Deposit Ratio. This is intended to ensure that banks do not lend beyond their capacity to lend and thus avoid the need to draw down their capital. What is the need for yet another regulation to achieve the same objective? Just as too many cooks spoil the broth, multiple regulations aimed at the same objective can produce similar results, for instance, by increasing the maturity mismatch between the asset and the liability sides of bank balance sheets.

How much more will the BB micromanage the banking system? It imposed lending-rate ceilings, restricted servicing fees, and now there is a floor on deposit rate. What next? The consequences of added micro prudential regulation can be good, bad, or ugly depending on its logic and timing.

The logic of this new regulation is incomprehensible in the context of the pressing challenges facing the banking system. The combination of a lending cap and a deposit rate floor limits the space within which banks can compete based on interest rates. The timing could not be worse than when the banking system is flushed with excess liquidity.

The right thing to do is to mop up the excess liquidity, which the BB has started doing. The success of the new regulation in terms of increasing deposit may in fact undermine the objective of this open market operation unless there is a dramatic increase in demand for credit. If credit demand remains weak, more mopping up will be needed leading to unnecessary increase in the BB's interest expenses.

When caps on interest are set at levels that are out of equilibrium with market rates, they have unintended negative consequences which can make everyone worse off, reduce financial services and thus discourage both savings and investment. Interest rate controls on the surface appear like an easy fix, but they have lasting negative consequences for the health of the economy.

Top News

Bangladesh Bank / Zahid Hussain / Zahid Hussain Analysis / asset-liability balance of banks / unsafe investments

Comments

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Top Stories

  • Clarify people the reasons behind fuel price hike, PM asks energy ministry, BPC
    Clarify people the reasons behind fuel price hike, PM asks energy ministry, BPC
  • Infograph: TBS
    Control on liquor import boosts local Carew sales
  • Debapriya Bhattacharya. TBS Sketch
    Keep subsidy in fertiliser and fuel, remove capacity charges: Dr Debapriya

MOST VIEWED

  • This won’t last forever.Photographer: Stefani Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images via Bloomberg
    Minimum wages are going up. Jobs may disappear
  • Brioche rolls exit an oven at the Brioche Pasquier factory in Milton Keynes, UK.Photographer: Ryan Peters/Brioche Pasquier
    The great European energy crisis is now coming for your food
  • International relations do not depend on state to state friendship but on mutual benefits, especially for the stronger state. Photo: Bloomberg
    Game of geopolitics: No permanent friends or foes
  • A unique exchange rate regime
    A unique exchange rate regime
  • Picture: Collected
    The six billion dollar man
  • Picture: Bloomberg
    A healthy economy needs risk, loss, and failure

Related News

  • BB allows banks to make drawing arrangements without prior permission
  • Taka devalued further, LC rate shoots to Tk112 a dollar
  • Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 
  • Bangladesh Bank and DNCC honour bKash
  • Loan rescheduling: Banks can’t show interest as income without recovering principal

Features

Bye bye! Photographer: Michael Zarrilli/Getty Images North America via Bloomberg

Three major takeaways from the FBI search on Trump’s home

3h | Panorama
Shafia Siddiqi (left) and Simran Akter (right). Photo: Noor A Alam

Big dreams in small rooms: The aspiring nurses of Geneva Camp

6h | Panorama
Illustration: TBS

How to deal with toxic people at work

7h | Pursuit
Women were more likely to report leaving the workforce between March 2020 and September 2021 than their male counterparts. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

Being single and smart is bad for your career if you are a woman

6h | Pursuit

More Videos from TBS

Anwar Industrial Group which started with Tk360 capital, now a thousand crore taka company

Anwar Industrial Group which started with Tk360 capital, now a thousand crore taka company

3h | Videos
Is this a new horizon in medical science?

Is this a new horizon in medical science?

8h | Videos
Can sleep help you become successful?

Can sleep help you become successful?

8h | Videos
Military drills to prepare invasion, says Taiwan

Military drills to prepare invasion, says Taiwan

9h | Videos

Most Read

1
Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 
Banking

Dollar crisis: BB orders removal of 6 banks’ treasury chiefs 

2
Diesel price hiked by Tk34 per litre, Octane by Tk46
Energy

Diesel price hiked by Tk34 per litre, Octane by Tk46

3
Photo: Collected
Transport

Will Tokyo’s traffic model solve Dhaka’s gridlocks?

4
Infographic: TBS
Banking

Dollar rate will be left to market after two months: Governor

5
Arrest warrant against Habib Group chairman, 4 others 
Crime

Arrest warrant against Habib Group chairman, 4 others 

6
File Photo: State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Nasrul Hamid
Energy

All factories to remain closed once a week under rationing system

EMAIL US
contact@tbsnews.net
FOLLOW US
WHATSAPP
+880 1847416158
The Business Standard
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Comment Policy
Copyright © 2022
The Business Standard All rights reserved
Technical Partner: RSI Lab

Contact Us

The Business Standard

Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000

Phone: +8801847 416158 - 59

Send Opinion articles to - oped.tbs@gmail.com

For advertisement- sales@tbsnews.net